## Graphing Inequations

So far we’ve drawn graphs where the relation is something like:

Something = something else

A typical example might have been:

These have all been equations, because they’ve had two expressions with an equals sign between them.  Now what about if you have another sign instead of the equals sign?  What about if you have something like this:

Now we’ve got a larger than or equals to sign.  How are we supposed to graph this?  Well, it’s easy if we split this inequation up into two parts.  One part is the part with an equals sign in it, and the other part is the one with a larger than sign in it:

is the same as  AND

So we can plot the graph in two bits.  First, we just need to plot the  bit, which we already know how to do.  It looks something like this:

Now what about the other part of the graph – the  part?  Well, this basically says any value of y that is larger than 3x + 2.  We already have a line marking out .  Values of y that are larger than this line are simply values above this line.  So to mark out the  part of the graph, I need to shade in the area above the line, because any point above the line counts as the  part.  So the overall graph should look something like this:

We can see the two bits of the graph now – there’s the  bit which is the line itself.  Then there’s the  which is the shaded part above the line.  Now what would have happened if there was a different sign in the relation – a smaller than or equals to for instance:

Once again we can split this inequation up into two parts for the graph:

is the same as  AND

So one part of this inequation is the same – the  part.  But the different part is the  part.  This is going to be another area we have to shade in on the graph.  But this time it’s an area for values of y that are smaller than 3x + 2.  This means the area is going to be below the  line.  So the overall graph will look like:

So we’ve covered how to graph inequations which have either a ‘’ or ‘’ sign in them.  What about inequations which have a ‘>’ or ‘<’ symbol in them?  Let’s try the same relation we’ve been using but with a ‘>’ symbol in it:

Now we can’t really split this up into two parts like we’ve done previously.  We know that the area represented by  is the area above the line .  However, because our relation is only a larger than relation, it doesn’t include the  line.  However, it’s pretty hard to draw the  area properly unless we have a line we can shade above.  So what we do is draw in the  line as a dotted line.  This tells the reader that the relation doesn’t include , but gives the reader a better idea of what the shaded area actually is.

So first we just draw the dotted line so we know where to shade: